Speaking Security

Share this post
Military contractor profits rely on public subsidies
stephensemler.substack.com

Military contractor profits rely on public subsidies

Speaking Security Newsletter | Advisory Note for Organizers and Candidates, n°105 | 18 August 2021

Aug 18, 2021
4
Share this post
Military contractor profits rely on public subsidies
stephensemler.substack.com

If you find these notes useful, you can support this newsletter here and SPRI, here. Sharing these newsletters also helps. Thank you!

Share

The Intercept published a really cool study on how much $10,000 of stock spread across the (current) top 5 military contractors in 2001 would yield in current dollars. Answer is $97,295, meaning that the investment would have outperformed the overall stock market by 58 percent during the course of the war in Afghanistan.

A foreign policy built around endless war probably inspired a good bit of investor confidence in these weapons firms. Company earnings play a role in a stock’s price, too—not to mention dividends (which the Intercept study factored in by reinvesting them)—and, taken together, this tranche of arms corporations’ earnings are mostly derived from federal government contracts. They’re subsidized.

*Figures below exclude revenue from foreign military sales. These sales are brokered by the US government about half the time.

Thanks for your time,

Stephen (@stephensemler; stephen@securityreform.org)

Find this note useful? Please consider becoming a supporter of SPRI. Unlike establishment think tanks, we rely exclusively on small donations.

Share this post
Military contractor profits rely on public subsidies
stephensemler.substack.com
TopNew

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Stephen Semler
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing