
Discover more from Speaking Security
If you find these notes useful, you can support this newsletter and SPRI, here.
For the first few years after the invasion, the ratio of US troops to US-funded contractors in Iraq was about 1 to 1, becoming more contractor-dominant as conventional forces started leaving after 2008. By comparison, the troop-to-contractor ratio was 5 to 1 in Vietnam, 2.5 to 1 in Korea, and 7 to 1 during WWII.
What does this mean in terms of cash? Based on my analysis of federal contract data, the US spent more than $155 billion on contractors in Iraq over a 20-year period (FY2003-22). Note that this figure refers only to contracts performed in Iraq and not the contracts for the Iraq war carried out in nearby(-ish) countries like Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the UAE. Does that make sense?
^Alt text for screen readers: The U.S. spent $155 billion on contractors in Iraq. This column chart has a bunch of red columns representing the value of U.S.-funded contracts performed in Iraq from 2003 to 2022. It peaks at 2005 and 2008: in both years, contract values amounted to $22 billion. Figures are expressed in constant 2023 dollars. Data is from the System for Award Management.
-Stephen (@stephensemler; stephen@securityreform.org)
Find this note useful? Please consider becoming a supporter of SPRI. Unlike establishment think tanks, we rely exclusively on small donations.