The Progressive Caucus isn’t living up to its name, a breakdown
Speaking Security Newsletter | Advisory Note for Organizers and Candidates, n°61 | 23 December 2020
I wanted to see how House members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) voted on military spending under Trump so I looked at the roll call votes for every National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) from fiscal year 2018 to FY2021.
*My analysis considers how CPC members voted on both the House version and final (‘conference’) version of each NDAA.
Almost one-third of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) never voted against an NDAA during the Trump administration. (Since Obama’s last NDAA [FY2017], the annual Pentagon budget has increased by over $100 billion.)
These 27 CPC members accepted on average $86,201 in war industry campaign contributions from 2017-2020, or 6.3x the average amount received by the 9 CPC members who voted against every NDAA under Trump.
^More on Rep. Adam Smith (WA-09), here. Campaign finance data via Open Secrets, retrieved a couple days ago.
CPC members bad on foreign policy are more likely to be bad on health care
I also looked at which CPC members support Medicare for All. (For the purposes of this study, support = co-sponsor to the Medicare for All Act.) Findings:
Support for M4A among the above 27 CPC members: 52 percent
Support for M4A among the other 58 CPC members I looked at: 97 percent
Here are the nine CPC members who voted against Trump-era NDAAs 100 percent of the time
Representatives Earl Blumenauer (OR-03), Adriano Espaillat (NY-13), Tulsi Gabbard (HI-02), Barbara Lee (CA-13), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14), Ilhan Omar (MN-05), Mark Pocan (WI-02), Ayanna Pressley (MA-07), and Rashida Tlaib (MI-13).
Thanks for your time (and please check out my recent article in Jacobin, here),
Stephen (@stephensemler; firstname.lastname@example.org)
Find this note useful? Please consider becoming a supporter of SPRI. Unlike establishment think tanks, we rely exclusively on small donations.